INFORMATION AND LINKS
CORMORANTS - REALLY A PROBLEM?
INFO & LINKS | BIRD MONITORING IN GERMANY | EU HABITATS DIRECTIVE (92/43/EEC) | EU BIRDS DIRECTIVE (79/409/EEC) | KILLING FIELDS | CRAZY VIKINGS | SUCCESS FOR EUROPE | CORMORANTS - REALLY A PROBLEM? | THE UNSPEAKABLE ... | JAEGERLATEIN | VICTOR FRANCK | OTHER LINKS | CURRENT PROACT CAMPAIGNS | JOIN THE PROACT TEAM


Are Cormorants really a problem to commercial fishermen and hobby anglers?

The alleged mass depletion of commercial and angling clubs' fish stocks in Europe and North America, principally on inland waters, has led to war being declared on the cormorant.
 
Are the fishermen's fears and claims justified? If so what can be done about it? the following article (translated from the German) presents facts, fiction and suggests solutions.

THE CORMORANT

From the Red List to the Pest List

The (Great) Cormorant Phalocrocorax carbo has been persecuted for centuries because of its fish eating habit. From being almost extinct in Germany in 1950, it was declared a protected species from the beginning of the 1970s. Populations have increased and are today larger and more stable as in preceding centuries.  

The welcome increase in the species generates a potential source of conflict between conservationists on the one hand and anglers and fishermen on the other. In many EU states there is either a regular hunting season for the bird, or breeding colonies have been systematically destroyed. In Germany alone permits are granted annually to shoot some 6000 cormorants.

The reasons for the positive population trend

The placing of the cormorant under protection in the 1970s is the main reason for its spread during the past decades. In addition food availability has improved. The drainage of agricultural nutrients into lakes and rivers promotes the development of many fish species providing the birds with rich pickings.

The increase of the species on inland waters in winter is also connected with the improved climatic conditions in Central Europe. Other than in the past, the cormorant in Central Europe is presented today with straightened river courses without oxbow lakes and overgrown banks, and a large number of open flooded gravel pits and fish ponds. The waters over-stocked by the anglers are an open invitation to the birds to spend the winter in these areas plentiful in fish. The former winter quarters in the Mediterranean area are deserted.

Food

Cormorants are fish eaters preferring prey between 10 and 20 cm in length. Before such fish reach a size suitable for human requirements they are naturally subject to a high mortality rate. As a result the damage to stocks by the cormorant is relatively small.

The daily nourishment requirement of wintering birds lies between 400 - 500 g fish, increasing to 700 g in the breeding season. Cormorants which hunt in salt water need only 200 - 300 g fish in winter and 500 g during the breeding period, due to the high fat content of salt water fish.

In waters with natural surroundings species of little interest to anglers such as Roach Rutilus rutilus, Rudd scardinius erythrophthalmus and Chub leuciscus cephalus are caught. In Switzerland it has been established that 60% of fish taken of wintering Cormorants are Roach.

Angling club fish ponds, straightened river courses, flooded gravel pits and reservoirs are usually characterised by an artificially high fish stock. As the cormorant mostly hunts fish swarms, it is natural that the larger part of the cormorants prey is taken from the fish ponds.

Cormorants take primarily young and sick fish. Of Roach caught by cormorants in a Swiss lake, 30% of the fish were infected with the tapeworm Ligula intestinalis, whereby only 3% of the total of the fish in the lake were infected. Hunting cormorants concentrate on these sick, slower and weaker fish and thereby contribute to a healthy fish stock.

Influence on fish stocks

It is impossible to estimate fish stocks in river systems and lake districts. As many fish species regularly migrate, from the ocean into the tiniest stream, the influence of predators at particular points cannot be determined. The cormorants fish uptake can only be established therefore in small, closed waters such as fish ponds. With this background, the numbers and percentages often introduced into the discussion on the alleged damage to fish stocks by cormorants is more than questionable.

The hunting success of the cormorant in waters with natural surroundings is very low. Trees and water plants at and overhanging the banks, together with structurally rich oxbows, offer the fish a large number of hiding places. The birds hunt only in the open areas of wide open waters.

Angling club fish ponds, straightened river courses and flooded gravel pits are usually characterised by a lack of varied structure. This leads to a loss of 20 60% of stocks to hunting cormorants in Carp cyprinus carpio breeding ponds. The fish population in such pond systems is unnaturally high, the fish have no protection and the small fish normally preferred by the Cormorants are usually completely removed by the pond managers.

In rivers, lakes and natural ponds looked after by angling clubs the losses to cormorants are considerably less, amounting to less than 10% of the total stock. The proportion of fish species of little interest to anglers caught by cormorants is usually over 50 % of all fish taken.

Fish protection without the shotgun

On waters threatened by cormorants, such as fish breeding ponds, fishermen, local authorities and conservationists should work hand in hand in improving the natural structure of the areas. This includes in particular the planting of exposed bank areas with groups of trees and the creation of shallow water areas and reed beds.

Structural improvement of waters leads not only to rest and protection zones for the fish; they also lead to the creation of new spawning grounds. Through this a more vigorous fish population is promoted which can better cope with losses to cormorants.

A steel wire construction over the ponds can also provide effective protection.

It has been established that single warning shots in winter quarters do not frighten off the birds. They simply move to other ponds which results in a greater energy requirement which has to be met by increased food intake.

If all possible measures implemented to protect fish stocks fail, and the birds cause provable damage, the fishermen affected should receive financial compensation from the state.

Humans and cormorants can co-exist without any problems. Where the birds can actually cause damage, in the rule at fish ponds, there are enough protection measures available. Hobby anglers, who at present complain the most about cormorants, should concentrate instead on improving the living conditions of their fish and reduce the unnaturally high and damaging size of the fish stocks in the waters they manage. They should also be advised that cormorants have hunted in European waters for a long time and that, in the 21st Century, competition jealousy and unfounded quasi-scientific theories will have no influence on the implementation of urgently required nature and species protection measures throughout Europe.

Source: Komitee gegen den Vogelmord website

http://www.komitee.de/projekte/brd/kormoran.html

Translation © David J A Conlin 2004

© Proact 2001 - 2004

 
Last updated on: